There is only one way to replace fossil fuels, and it is being carefully sidelined and gaslighted by all of the institutions currently tasked with coming up with solutions (the IEA, IRENA, IPCC etc) - plus the vast influence of 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀, 𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗯𝘆𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 and 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗿𝘀.

There is only one way to replace fossil fuels and it will come at a huge cost to all those who currently gain from or are connected to the fossil fuel industry; via investment funds, pensions, insurance companies or other financial means.

A massive shock must happen and that will only happen when policy - at national level, and globally - prioritises and subsidises the immediate roll-out of 𝗵𝘆𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻 and 𝗵𝘆𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗲𝗻-𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗲𝘀.

Hydrogen is a 𝗱𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 of fossil fuels in 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 and at 𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘁.

When this is not hidden as a plain fact by institutions such as the IEA, IRENA, the IPCC and just about every shareholder-funded lobby group in Brussels - then we will start to see traction on emissions.

If people continue to think that batteries are the way forward, with their many problems and limited use-cases unfortunately we have lost.

My first book explains in a commercially/ideologically unbiased way how net zero can be achieved; and yes that means hydrogen.

My second book will explain the barriers: shareholders, lobbyists and financiers (as well as public institutions such as the IEA, IRENA, the IPCC etc) who are blocking, delaying and obfuscating a clear and unobstructed path to net zero.

Please understand: the huge cost of collapsing the fossil fuel industry is the primary issue. However, those most effected will not be average citizens. This is why hydrogen is treated as such a threat, and why hydrogen must be pushed via policy (and by those within the non-shareholder-funded NGOs out there) as the only practical and achievable way of limiting temperature rise to below 2°C by 2050.